5406022026-04-012026-06-305406022026-04-012026-06-30in-capmkt:OtherExpenses1Member5406022026-04-012026-06-30in-capmkt:OtherExpenses2Member5406022026-04-012026-06-30in-capmkt:OtherExpenses3Member5406022026-04-012026-06-30ItemsThatWillNotBeReclassifiedToProfitAndLoss1iso4217:INRiso4217:INRxbrli:shares540602GTPLNOTLISTEDINE869I01013GTPL HATHWAY LIMITEDMain BoardEquity2026-04-012027-03-312026-07-152026-07-08INRMillionsQuarterlyFirst quarterSingle segmentMedia & Entertainment2026-07-1516:30:002026-07-1517:24:00Not applicablefalsefalseNot Applicable2026-04-012026-06-30UnauditedStandalone68772500005485000069321000000035430000148620000837200005327800006103940000690449000027610000027610000646000010300007490000020120000000020120000-660000194600001124630000100.180.18000.180.181. The above standalone unaudited financial results have been prepared in accordance with Indian Accounting Standards as prescribed under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with the relevant rules issued thereunder, and other accounting principles generally accepted in India. <br /> <br /> 2. The above standalone unaudited financial results were reviewed by the Audit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors in their meeting held on July 15, 2026, as required under Regulation 33 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The same have subjected to Limited Review by the Statutory Auditors. <br /> <br /> 3. The Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of Communications, Government of India (“DoT”) has raised demand of Rs. 9,754.15 million on the Company consisting of Principal amount of Rs. 2,286.50 million and related interest, penalty and interest on penalty of Rs 7,467.65 million (as of July 31, 2020) towards license fee by including the revenue generated from its cable television business. <br /> <br /> These demands are mainly based on Hon’ble Supreme Court’s Judgment in the matter of Union of India v/s AUSPI & Ors. bearing C.A. Nos.6328 – 6399 on AGR dues from telecom operators (“AGR Judgment”). Subsequently, vide order dated June 11 and June 18, 2020, the Supreme Court clarified that the AGR judgement pertaining to telecom companies could not have been basis for raising demands in the non-telecom PSUs and accordingly DoT withdrew the demands on the non-telecom PSUs. The Company, in line with the observations made by the Supreme Court has made representations to DoT against said demands, which DoT has taken on record. <br /> <br /> Also, All India Digital Cable Federation (AIDCF) for all its member companies had filed an intervention petition in TDSAT in the matter of Asianet Satellite Communications Private Limited versus Union of India bearing TP No. 54 of 2020 challenging the demands raised on such member companies (the Company being a member too) by including its non-licensed income for computation of license fees. Further, the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting has in February 2021 written to DoT (along with the representation of AIDCF) that it grants permission to Multi System Operators ("MSOs") for cable tv operations and does not levy any license fee on the revenue, and hence the revenues earned by MSOs from cable tv business may not be clubbed with the revenue earned by them under Internet Service Provider’s license. <br /> <br /> With effect from 01/10/2021,definition of AGR has been amended and Applicable Gross Revenue (ApGR) was introduced which was starting point for arriving AGR. ApGR specifically excludes revenue from activities under a license / permission issued by MIB. Further, by an order dated 05.10.2021, the TDSAT has stayed all demands of additional license fee. The interim order is continuing and the petition is pending before the TDSAT. Additionally, TDSAT in February 2022 set aside the demands raised by DoT in matter relating to another ISP license holder by treating them at par with some PSUs who held similar license. The DoT has challenged the TDSAT order which is still pending. Hence, the extent and timing of outflow of funds that may be required is dependent on the outcome of litigation. <br /> <br /> Basis its assessment of the legal position as stated above and based on the opinion of independent legal experts, the Company is confident that it has good grounds on merit to defend itself. Accordingly, the Company is of the view that no provision is necessary to be made in the financial results in relation to the demands and the same has been considered as a contingent liability. <br /> <br /> 4. Exceptional items for the quarter and previous year ended March 31, 2026 amounting to Rs. 56.89 Millions which represents provision for impairment in carrying values of investments in certain subsidiary companies. <br /> <br /> 5. As per Ind AS -108 - "Operating Segment" segment information has been provided under the Notes to Consolidated Financial Results. <br /> <br /> 6. The figures for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, is the balancing figures between the audited figures with respect to full financial year and the published unaudited year to date figures upto the third quarter ended December 31, 2025 , which were subjected to limited review. <br /> <br /> 7. During the current quarter, the Company has entered into a Business Transfer Agreement ("BTA") on June 23, 2026, with entities belonging to the ACT Group for the acquisition of their Cable Television Business on a going concern basis through a slump sale for an aggregate consideration of Rs. 362.30 million. The effective date of the acquisition is July 1, 2026.Purchase of Project Material17960000Operating Expenses5425600000Other Expenses660380000Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss-880000-880000-2200000-660000