CMNL2026-04-012026-06-30CMNL2026-06-30CMNL2026-03-31CMNL2026-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain1CMNL2026-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain2CMNL2026-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain3CMNL2026-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain4CMNL2026-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain5CMNL2026-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain6xbrli:pure000000CMNLNOTLISTEDINE06PV01010CHAMAN METALLICS LIMITED2026-04-012027-03-31Quarterly2026-06-30SMEfalseSince the shares of the entity is listed on SME Exchange, the Compliance Report on Corporate Governance is not applicable.truefalseNot Applicable as the Company has not acquired any shares or voting rights in any Unlisted Company during the reporting quarterfalseNo fine or penalty has been imposed by regulatory, statutory, enforcement authority or judicial body against the listed entity or its directors, key managerial personnel, senior management, promoter subsidiary, in relation to the listed entity, during the reporting quartertruetruecomc00677Original00000 Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 20 Kolkata2023-03-31The appeal of the revenue stands dismissed and it is in the favour of the company. Still Appeal effect is to be taken . It is still under process.The appeal of the revenue stands dismissed and it is in the favour of the company. Still Appeal effect is to be taken . It is still under process.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bengaluru2019-12-04An adjustment of ₹32,400/- was initially proposed under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on account of disallowance of certain expenditures, which were subsequently allowed. Following this, an intimation under Section 245(1) was issued, proposing adjustment of the refund against outstanding demand(s). Simultaneously, an appeal was under process, and the matter was decided in favour of the company, with the appeal of the revenue being dismissed. Once the appeal effect is given by the department, the corresponding outstanding demands will be nullified, and the amount previously adjusted will become refundable.An adjustment of ₹32,400/- was initially proposed under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on account of disallowance of certain expenditures, which were subsequently allowed. Following this, an intimation under Section 245(1) was issued, proposing adjustment of the refund against outstanding demand(s). Simultaneously, an appeal was under process, and the matter was decided in favour of the company, with the appeal of the revenue being dismissed. Once the appeal effect is given by the department, the corresponding outstanding demands will be nullified, and the amount previously adjusted will become refundable.Department Of Goods And Services Tax Government Of Maharashtra, India2022-03-30Paid the amount but the status of transaction is still pending on portal.Paid the amount but the status of transaction is still pending on portal.Hare Krushna Developers LLP2025-04-17Application filed and 1st Hearing is set on 31-07-2025. Further hearing date scheduled on 11.09.2026Application filed and 1st Hearing is set on 31-07-2025. Further hearing date scheduled on 11.09.2026Deputy Commissioner of State Tax2026-02-11Authorised Representative attended and presented documents as required on 09.03.2026.No further communication was received by the depatrment.Deputy Commissioner of State Tax2026-02-18No further communication was received by the depatrment.No further communication was received by the depatrment.