5001792025-04-012025-06-305001792025-06-305001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors15001792025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors15001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors25001792025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors25001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors35001792025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors35001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors45001792025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors45001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors55001792025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors55001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors65001792025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors65001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors75001792025-06-30CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors75001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees145001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees145001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees155001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees155001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees165001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees165001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees175001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees175001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees185001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees185001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees415001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees415001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees425001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees425001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees435001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees435001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees445001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees445001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees685001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees685001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees695001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees695001792025-04-012025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees705001792025-06-30CompositionOfCommittees705001792025-06-30MeetingOfBoardOfDirectors15001792025-04-012025-06-30MeetingOfBoardOfDirectors15001792025-06-30MeetingOfBoardOfDirectors25001792025-04-012025-06-30MeetingOfBoardOfDirectors25001792025-04-012025-06-30MeetingOfCommittees15001792025-06-30MeetingOfCommittees15001792025-04-012025-06-30MeetingOfCommittees25001792025-06-30MeetingOfCommittees25001792025-04-012025-06-30MeetingOfCommittees35001792025-06-30MeetingOfCommittees35001792025-04-012025-06-30MeetingOfCommittees45001792025-06-30MeetingOfCommittees45001792025-03-315001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain15001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain25001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain35001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain45001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain55001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain65001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain75001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain85001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain95001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain105001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain115001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain125001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain135001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain145001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain155001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain165001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain175001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain185001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain195001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain205001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain215001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain225001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain235001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain245001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain255001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain265001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain275001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain285001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain295001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain305001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain315001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain325001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain335001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain345001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain355001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain365001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain375001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain385001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain395001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain405001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain415001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain425001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain435001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain445001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain455001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain465001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain475001792025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain48xbrli:pure500179HCL-INSYSNOTLISTEDINE236A01020HCL INFOSYSTEMS LIMITED2025-04-012026-03-31Quarterly2025-06-30EquitytruetruefalseThere is no acqusition of shares or voting rights in unlisted companies during the April to June 2025falseNo fines and penalties during the April to June quartertruefalseTop 2000 listed entitiestrueh00044OriginaltruefalseMrNeelesh Agarwal******00149856Non-Executive - Non Independent DirectorNot Applicable1964-04-30falseActiveNA2022-04-012023-09-201010MrNikhil Sinha******01174807Non-Executive - Independent DirectorChairperson1960-08-03falseActiveNA2019-04-012024-04-01751111MrPawan Kumar Danwar******06847503Non-Executive - Non Independent DirectorNot Applicable1966-07-07falseActiveNA2014-03-212024-09-181020MrsRitu Arora******07019164Non-Executive - Independent DirectorNot Applicable1973-05-05falseInactiveNA2015-04-062020-04-062025-04-05119.31130Tenure CompletionMrRaghu Chivukula******00520704Non-Executive - Independent DirectorNot Applicable1963-10-04falseActiveNA2023-08-1022.221110MrKirti Kumar Dawar******00392141Non-Executive - Independent DirectorNot Applicable1955-03-09falseActiveNA2023-08-1022.221121MsRita Gupta******00899240Non-Executive - Non Independent DirectorNot Applicable1962-10-21falseActiveNA2025-02-072025-03-223020truetruetrueAudit Committee01174807Nikhil SinhaNon-Executive - Independent DirectorChairperson2024-04-01Audit Committee07019164Ritu AroraNon-Executive - Independent DirectorMember2015-04-232025-04-05Audit Committee06847503Pawan Kumar DanwarNon-Executive - Non Independent DirectorMember2024-04-01Audit Committee00520704Raghu ChivukulaNon-Executive - Independent DirectorMember2024-04-01Audit Committee00392141Kirti Kumar DawarNon-Executive - Independent DirectorMember2024-04-01Nomination and remuneration committee07019164Ritu AroraNon-Executive - Independent DirectorChairperson2024-04-012025-04-05Nomination and remuneration committee01174807Nikhil SinhaNon-Executive - Independent DirectorMember2019-05-13Nomination and remuneration committee06847503Pawan Kumar DanwarNon-Executive - Non Independent DirectorMember2022-04-01Nomination and remuneration committee00520704Raghu ChivukulaNon-Executive - Independent DirectorChairperson2025-04-06Stakeholders Relationship Committee00392141Kirti Kumar DawarNon-Executive - Independent DirectorChairperson2024-04-01Stakeholders Relationship Committee06847503Pawan Kumar DanwarNon-Executive - Non Independent DirectorMember2019-05-13Stakeholders Relationship Committee00149856Neelesh AgarwalNon-Executive - Non Independent DirectorMember2022-04-012025-02-07true7742025-05-23104true653Audit Committee2025-02-07true5540Audit Committee2025-05-23104true4430Nomination and remuneration committee2025-02-07true3320Nomination and remuneration committee2025-05-23104true3320truetruetruetrueNAtruetruetrueTwinkle MongaCompany Secretary and Compliance OfficerfalseTwinkle MongaCompany Secretary and Compliance OfficerNoida2025-07-2811110Commissioner of Income Tax2001-03-01Income Tax Appeal AY 1998-99. Compensation received from Hewlett Packard (HP) of Rs. 6,080.00 lakhs for termination of contract was assessed as Capital Gains with a demand of Rs 1,490.03 lakhs. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the assessment order. However the Income Tax Appellete Tribunal and the Delhi High Court held the same as capital receipt not liable to tax. Income Tax department has filed SLP in Supreme Court which is pending for admission. Financial implication Rs. 1,490.03 lakhs.No change.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax2017-01-27Income Tax Appeal AY 2013-14. The Assessing Officer disallowed business expense of Rs 6,938.27 lakhs with a tax demand payable of Rs 47.00 lakhs. The Dispute Resolution Panel confirmed the additions. Appeal filed before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is pending for hearing. Financial implication Rs. 47.00 lakhs.The Company had filed a declaration in Form 1 dated 29.04.2025 for settling the case under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 and the same was accepted and the case settled by order of settlement in Form 4 issued on 04.07.2025. Hence the matter stands closed.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax2015-06-02Income Tax Appeal AY 2011-12. The Assessing Officer disallowed business expense of Rs 610.81 lakhs with a tax demand payable of Rs 300.28 lakhs. Appeal filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is pendig for hearing. Financial implication Rs. 300.28 lakhs.No change.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax2016-06-14Income Tax Appeal AY 2012-13. The Assessing Officer disallowed business expense of Rs 239.46 lakhs. However There was no dax demand payable as the tax was already paid under the Minimum Alternate Tax regime which was higher. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) disposed off appeal in our favour. The Department filed the appeal to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which is pending for hearing. Financial implications Rs. NIL.The Company has filed a declaration in Form 1 dated 29.04.2025 for settling the case under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 and the same is under consideration by the designated authority.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax2020-01-27Income Tax Appeal AY 2017-18. The Assessing Officer disallowed business expense of Rs 6,443.34 lakhs with a tax demand payable of Rs 697.36 lakhs. Appeal filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is pending for hearing. Financial implication Rs. 697.36 lakhs.No change.National Faceless Assessment Center2021-12-01Income Tax Appeal AY 2018-19. The Assessing Officer disallowed business expense of Rs 3,051.70 lakhs. No Tax demand was payable due to adjustment of losses. Appeal filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is pending for hearing. Financial implication Rs. NIL.The Company had filed a declaration in Form 1 dated 29.04.2025 for settling the case under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 and the same was accepted and the case settled by order of settlement in Form 4 issued on 04.07.2025. Hence the matter stands closed.Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department2023-01-24Income Tax Appeal AY 2021-22. The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs 13,284.52 lakhs with a tax demand payable of Rs 253.28 lakhs. Appeal filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is pending for hearing. Financial implication Rs. 253.28 lakhs.No change.Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department2024-04-24Income Tax Appeal AY 2022-23. The Assessing Officer disallowed business expense of Rs 246.88 lakhs with a tax demand payable of Rs 107.48 lakhs. Appeal filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is pending for hearing. Financial implication Rs. 107.48 lakhs.No change.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax2020-01-24Income Tax Appeal AY 2017-18. Case of HCL Learning Limited merged with the company.The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs 201.38 lakhs. No Tax demand was payable due to adjustment of losses. Appeal filed before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is pending for hearing.Financial implcation Rs. NIL.The Company had filed a declaration in Form 1 dated 29.04.2025 for settling the case under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 and the same was accepted and the case settled by order of settlement in Form 4 issued on 04.07.2025. Hence the matter stands closed.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax2009-01-21Income Tax Appeal AY 2006-07. Case of HCL Infinet Limited merged with the company. The Assessing Officer disallowed busniess expense of Rs 172.33 lakhs with a tax demand payable of Rs 153.93 lakhs.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the order. However the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal gave partial relief and remanded the case to the Assessing Oficer. In the remand proceedings the Assessing Officer disallowed Rs 122.38 lakhs with a tax demand of Rs. 76.04 lakhs. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the appeal. Appeal filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is pending for hearing. Financial implication Rs. 76.04 lakhs.No change.Deputy Commissioner, Sales Tax Check Post, Lakhanpur, Jammu2007-12-24The Company has filed an appeal before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jammu, against a demand of Rs. 94.17 lakhs raised by the Check Post Authority for FY 2007–08. The demand pertains to inter-state sale of goods being treated as local sales under works contract provisions. The case is currently pending with Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jammu.The Company has filed an appeal before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jammu, against a demand of Rs. 94.17 lakhs raised by the Check Post Authority for FY 2007–08. The demand pertains to inter-state sale of goods being treated as local sales under works contract provisions. The case is currently pending with Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jammu.VATO (VAT Officer), Delhi2013-12-08The Company has filed an appeal before the Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi, against a demand of Rs. 201.21 lakhs for FY 2009–10, arising on account of pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi.The Company has filed an appeal before the Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi, against a demand of Rs. 201.21 lakhs for FY 2009–10, arising on account of pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi.Assistant Commissioner, DVAT, Delhi2014-03-30The Company has filed an appeal before the Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi, against a demand of Rs. 268.38 lakhs for FY 2010–11, related to pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi.The Company has filed an appeal before the Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi, against a demand of Rs. 268.38 lakhs for FY 2010–11, related to pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi.Joint Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Noida2014-06-09The Company has filed an appeal before the Tribunal, Commercial Tax, Noida, against a demand of Rs. 85 lakhs for FY 2010–11. The demand relates to reversal of Input Tax Credit on inter-state stock transfers of goods purchased with VAT. The case is currently pending with Tribunal, Commercial Tax, Noida.The Company has filed an appeal before the Tribunal, Commercial Tax, Noida, against a demand of Rs. 85 lakhs for FY 2010–11. The demand relates to reversal of Input Tax Credit on inter-state stock transfers of goods purchased with VAT. The case is currently pending with Tribunal, Commercial Tax, Noida.VATO (VAT Officer), Delhi2014-08-21The Company has filed an appeal before the Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi, against a demand of Rs. 162.13 lakhs for FY 2010–11, arising on account of classification of multifunctional devices under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi.The Company has filed an appeal before the Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi, against a demand of Rs. 162.13 lakhs for FY 2010–11, arising on account of classification of multifunctional devices under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi.VATO (VAT Officer) (Special Zone), Delhi2015-01-23The Company has filed an appeal before the Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi, against a demand of Rs. 165.38 lakhs for FY 2011–12, related to classification of multifunctional devices under a higher tax rate. The case is currently pending with Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi.The Company has filed an appeal before the Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi, against a demand of Rs. 165.38 lakhs for FY 2011–12, related to classification of multifunctional devices under a higher tax rate. The case is currently pending with Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi.Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Dehradun2015-02-28The Company has filed a rectification application before the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, against a demand of Rs. 175.57 lakhs for FY 2010–11. The demand pertains on account of pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Dehradun, Uttarakhand.The Company has filed a rectification application before the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, against a demand of Rs. 175.57 lakhs for FY 2010–11. The demand pertains on account of pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Dehradun, Uttarakhand.Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bangalore2015-05-29The Company has filed a rectification application before the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Bangalore, Karnataka, against a demand of Rs. 71.20 lakhs for FY 2008–09, in connection with pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Bangalore, Karnataka.The Company has filed a rectification application before the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Bangalore, Karnataka, against a demand of Rs. 71.20 lakhs for FY 2008–09, in connection with pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Bangalore, Karnataka.Commissioner of Customs (Imports), New Delhi2015-07-31The Company has filed an appeal before CESTAT, Delhi, against a customs duty demand of Rs. 4,047 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand) for the period 2006–2009. The demand relates to import of master CDs (OPK kits) used for pre-loading software during computer manufacturing. The case is currently pending with CESTAT, Delhi.The Company has filed an appeal before CESTAT, Delhi, against a customs duty demand of Rs. 4,047 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand) for the period 2006–2009. The demand relates to import of master CDs (OPK kits) used for pre-loading software during computer manufacturing. The case is currently pending with CESTAT, Delhi.Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Anti Evasion, Jaipur2015-08-22The Company has filed a Sales Tax Revision Petition before the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur, against a demand of Rs. 585.03 lakhs for FY 2011–12, arising from classification of mobile battery chargers under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur.The Company has filed a Sales Tax Revision Petition before the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur, against a demand of Rs. 585.03 lakhs for FY 2011–12, arising from classification of mobile battery chargers under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur.Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Anti Evasion, Jaipur2015-08-22The Company has filed a Sales Tax Revision Petition before the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur, against a demand of Rs. 906.29 lakhs for FY 2012–13, relating to classification of mobile battery chargers at a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur.The Company has filed a Sales Tax Revision Petition before the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur, against a demand of Rs. 906.29 lakhs for FY 2012–13, relating to classification of mobile battery chargers at a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur.Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai2016-05-09The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 106.32 lakhs for FY 2011–12, arising from classification of Bluetooth headsets at a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 106.32 lakhs for FY 2011–12, arising from classification of Bluetooth headsets at a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai2016-05-09The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 86.58 lakhs for FY 2012–13, related to classification of Bluetooth headsets at a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 86.58 lakhs for FY 2012–13, related to classification of Bluetooth headsets at a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.VATO (VAT Officer), Delhi2017-05-25The Company has filed an appeal before the Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi, against a demand of Rs. 136.19 lakhs for FY 2012–13, arising from pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi.The Company has filed an appeal before the Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi, against a demand of Rs. 136.19 lakhs for FY 2012–13, arising from pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Spl. Commissioner, Deptt. of Trade & Taxes, Delhi.Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai2017-06-22The Company (DDMS Ltd., now merged with HCL Infosystems Ltd.) has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 445.26 lakhs for FY 2012–13, in respect of classification of Tablet PCs under a higher tax rate. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.The Company (DDMS Ltd., now merged with HCL Infosystems Ltd.) has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 445.26 lakhs for FY 2012–13, in respect of classification of Tablet PCs under a higher tax rate. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.Sales Tax Officer, Bhubneshwar, Odisha2017-09-26The Company has filed a Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India against a demand of Rs. 110.89 lakhs for FY 2012–17, pertaining to interest on Entry Tax paid as per Order of the Hon’ble Odisha High Court. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.The Company has filed a Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India against a demand of Rs. 110.89 lakhs for FY 2012–17, pertaining to interest on Entry Tax paid as per Order of the Hon’ble Odisha High Court. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Noida, U.P.2017-10-31The Company has filed an appeal before CESTAT, Allahabad, against a service tax demand of Rs. 2,284.81 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), imposed on various exempted/non-taxable services pertaining to the period from July 2010 to June 2015. The case is currently pending with CESTAT, Allahabad.The Company has filed an appeal before CESTAT, Allahabad, against a service tax demand of Rs. 2,284.81 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), imposed on various exempted/non-taxable services pertaining to the period from July 2010 to June 2015. The case is currently pending with CESTAT, Allahabad.Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Noida, U.P.2018-02-02The Company has filed an appeal before CESTAT, Allahabad, against a service tax demand of Rs. 31,234.10 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), arising on account of disallowance of CENVAT credit on certain common input services used for both taxable and exempted outputs during June 2010 to June 2015. The case is currently pending with CESTAT, Allahabad.The Company has filed an appeal before CESTAT, Allahabad, against a service tax demand of Rs. 31,234.10 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), arising on account of disallowance of CENVAT credit on certain common input services used for both taxable and exempted outputs during June 2010 to June 2015. The case is currently pending with CESTAT, Allahabad.Excise & Taxation Officer, Mohali, Punjab2018-02-22The Company has filed an appeal before the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Mohali, Punjab, against a demand of Rs. 738.52 lakhs for FY 2010–11, in relation to classification of mobile battery chargers under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Mohali, Punjab.The Company is evaluating its options to avail legal remedies in accordance with the law against the dismissal order received from the appellate authority.Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, Bhubaneshwar2018-06-05The Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Odisha High Court, Bhubaneswar, against a demand of Rs. 153.46 lakhs for FY 2014–15, on account of Input Tax Credit mismatch. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Odisha High Court, Bhubaneswar.The Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Odisha High Court, Bhubaneswar, against a demand of Rs. 153.46 lakhs for FY 2014–15, on account of Input Tax Credit mismatch. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Odisha High Court, Bhubaneswar.Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Noida, U.P.2018-12-19The Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj, against a service tax demand of Rs. 442.71 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), related to tax levied on interest income from lease transactions for FY 2005–06. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj.The Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj, against a service tax demand of Rs. 442.71 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), related to tax levied on interest income from lease transactions for FY 2005–06. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj.Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Noida, U.P.2018-12-19The Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj, against a service tax demand of Rs. 5,730.35 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), in respect of deemed sale income from leasing transactions as per Accounting Standard–19 for the period from 1st July 2010 to 30th June 2013. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj.The Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj, against a service tax demand of Rs. 5,730.35 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), in respect of deemed sale income from leasing transactions as per Accounting Standard–19 for the period from 1st July 2010 to 30th June 2013. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj.Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Noida, U.P.2018-12-19The Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj, against a service tax demand of Rs. 5,730.35 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), in respect of deemed sale income from leasing transactions as per Accounting Standard–19 for the period from 1st July 2010 to 30th June 2013. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj.The Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj, against a service tax demand of Rs. 5,730.35 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), in respect of deemed sale income from leasing transactions as per Accounting Standard–19 for the period from 1st July 2010 to 30th June 2013. The case is currently pending with Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj.Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Noida, U.P.2019-02-12The Company has filed an appeal before CESTAT, Allahabad, against a service tax demand of Rs. 1,666.76 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), on royalty paid to OEMs for procurement of operating software during the period 1st April 2005 to 15th May 2008, under the category of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) services. The case is currently pending with CESTAT, Allahabad.The Company has filed an appeal before CESTAT, Allahabad, against a service tax demand of Rs. 1,666.76 lakhs (Interest and penalty are applicable in addition to the tax demand), on royalty paid to OEMs for procurement of operating software during the period 1st April 2005 to 15th May 2008, under the category of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) services. The case is currently pending with CESTAT, Allahabad.Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Mumbai2019-03-16The Company (DDMS Ltd., now merged with HCL Infosystems Ltd.) has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 137.66 lakhs for FY 2014–15, in respect of classification of Tablet PCs under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.The Company (DDMS Ltd., now merged with HCL Infosystems Ltd.) has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 137.66 lakhs for FY 2014–15, in respect of classification of Tablet PCs under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Mumbai2019-06-06The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 139.17 lakhs for FY 2014–15, relating to classification of Bluetooth devices, Tablet PCs, projectors, and multifunctional devices under a higher tax rate. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 139.17 lakhs for FY 2014–15, relating to classification of Bluetooth devices, Tablet PCs, projectors, and multifunctional devices under a higher tax rate. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Mumbai2019-09-24The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 361.89 lakhs for FY 2013–14, in respect of classification of Tablet PCs under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 361.89 lakhs for FY 2013–14, in respect of classification of Tablet PCs under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Mumbai2020-05-03The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 261.50 lakhs for FY 2015–16, related to classification of Bluetooth devices, Tablet PCs, and multifunctional devices under a higher tax rate. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 261.50 lakhs for FY 2015–16, related to classification of Bluetooth devices, Tablet PCs, and multifunctional devices under a higher tax rate. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.Excise & Taxation Officer, Mohali, Punjab2020-08-31The Company has filed an appeal before the Punjab VAT Tribunal against a demand of Rs. 92.62 lakhs for FY 2012–13, arising from classification of Mobile battery chargers under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Punjab VAT Tribunal, Punjab.The Company has filed an appeal before the Punjab VAT Tribunal against a demand of Rs. 92.62 lakhs for FY 2012–13, arising from classification of Mobile battery chargers under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Punjab VAT Tribunal, Punjab.Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Mumbai2020-11-11The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 569.54 lakhs for FY 2016–17, in relation to classification of Tablet PCs and multifunctional devices under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 569.54 lakhs for FY 2016–17, in relation to classification of Tablet PCs and multifunctional devices under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Mumbai2021-09-29The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 332.95 lakhs for FY 2017–18, pertaining to classification of Tablet PCs, multifunctional devices, and computer peripherals under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.The Company has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 332.95 lakhs for FY 2017–18, pertaining to classification of Tablet PCs, multifunctional devices, and computer peripherals under a higher rate of tax. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Ahmedabad2022-08-01The Company has filed an appeal before the Gujarat VAT Tribunal, Ahmedabad, against a demand of Rs. 65.98 lakhs for FY 2015–16, related to disallowance of VAT claimed on credit notes issued to dealers. The case is currently pending with Gujarat VAT Tribunal, Ahmedabad.The Company has filed an appeal before the Gujarat VAT Tribunal, Ahmedabad, against a demand of Rs. 65.98 lakhs for FY 2015–16, related to disallowance of VAT claimed on credit notes issued to dealers. The case is currently pending with Gujarat VAT Tribunal, Ahmedabad.Commercial Tax Officer, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh2022-09-09The Company (DDMS Ltd., now merged with HCL Infosystems Ltd.) has filed an application for reopening an ex-parte demand of Rs. 155.70 lakhs for FY 2017–18, arising from ITC disallowances. The case is currently pending with Commercial Tax Officer, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.The Company (DDMS Ltd., now merged with HCL Infosystems Ltd.) has filed an application for reopening an ex-parte demand of Rs. 155.70 lakhs for FY 2017–18, arising from ITC disallowances. The case is currently pending with Commercial Tax Officer, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Noida, Uttar Pradesh2025-03-04The Company has filed a rectification application before the Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, against a demand of Rs. 80.22 lakhs for FY 2017–18, on account of rejection of CENVAT credit of various cesses availed in TRAN-1. The case is currently pending with Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Noida, Uttar Pradesh.The Company received a rectification order in DRC-08 where the rectification has been accepted and demand has now been rectified and appropriated on GSTN portal as well. The Company is currently evaluating its options to avail legal remedies in accordance with the law against such appropriation.Joint Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Noida2014-06-09The demand pertains on account of pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rate. The said demand is of Rs. 57.25 lakhs for FY 2010–11.The Company has filed an appeal before the Additional Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, against a demand of Rs. 57.25 lakhs for FY 2010–11. The demand pertains on account of pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Additional Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Noida, Uttar Pradesh.Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Jaipur, Rajasthan2016-06-23The demand pertains on account of on account of Input Tax Credit mismatch. The said demand is of Rs. 62.01 lakhs for FY 2014–15.The Company has filed an appeal before Appellate Authority II, Commercial Tax, Jaipur, against a demand of Rs. 62.01 lakhs for FY 2014–15, on account of Input Tax Credit mismatch. The case is currently pending with Assistant Commissioner of Commerical Tax, Special - Jaipur II, Jaipur, Rajasthan.Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Mumbai2020-08-28The demand pertains on account of pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The said demand is of Rs. 52.30 lakhs for FY 2015–16The Company (DDMS Ltd., now merged with HCL Infosystems Ltd.) has filed an appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra, against a demand of Rs. 52.30 lakhs for FY 2015–16. The demand pertains on account of pending statutory forms on inter-state sales at concessional tax rates. The case is currently pending with Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Sales Tax, Mumbai, Maharashtra.Commercial Tax Officer, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh2020-12-01Application filed for reopening an ex-parte demand of Rs. 61.60 lakhs for FY 2016–17, arising from ITC disallowance.The Company (DDMS Ltd., now merged with HCL Infosystems Ltd.) has filed an application for reopening an ex-parte demand of Rs. 61.60 lakhs for FY 2016–17, arising from ITC disallowances. The case is currently pending with Commercial Tax Officer, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.