CMNL2025-04-012025-06-30CMNL2025-06-30CMNL2025-03-31CMNL2025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain1CMNL2025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain2CMNL2025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain3CMNL2025-06-30OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain4xbrli:pure000000CMNLNOTLISTEDINE06PV01010CHAMAN METALLICS LIMITED2025-04-012026-03-31Quarterly2025-06-30SMEfalseBeing an SME, provisions relating to Corporate Governance is not ApplicabletruefalseDuring the Quarter ended 30-06-2025, the Company has not made any acquisition of shares or voting rights in Unlisted Companies.falseDuring the Quarter ended 30-06-2025, No fine or penalty has been imposed on the Company. Hence, this clause is not applicable.truetruecomc00677Original00000Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 20 Kolkata2023-03-31The appeal of the revenue stands dismissed and it is in the favour of the company. Still Appeal effect is to be taken . It is still under process.The appeal of the revenue stands dismissed and it is in the favour of the company. Still Appeal effect is to be taken . It is still under process.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bengaluru2019-12-04An adjustment of ₹32,400/- was initially proposed under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on account of disallowance of certain expenditures, which were subsequently allowed. Following this, an intimation under Section 245(1) was issued, proposing adjustment of the refund against outstanding demand(s). Simultaneously, an appeal was under process, and the matter was decided in favour of the company, with the appeal of the revenue being dismissed. Once the appeal effect is given by the department, the corresponding outstanding demands will be nullified, and the amount previously adjusted will become refundable.An adjustment of ₹32,400/- was initially proposed under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on account of disallowance of certain expenditures, which were subsequently allowed. Following this, an intimation under Section 245(1) was issued, proposing adjustment of the refund against outstanding demand(s). Simultaneously, an appeal was under process, and the matter was decided in favour of the company, with the appeal of the revenue being dismissed. Once the appeal effect is given by the department, the corresponding outstanding demands will be nullified, and the amount previously adjusted will become refundable.Department Of Goods And Services Tax Government Of Maharashtra, India2022-03-30Failed to make payment to the party (Axis Bank) or holds the amount due Rs.81,867 . Pending and reply to be submittedFailed to make payment to the party (Axis Bank) or holds the amount due Rs.81,867 . Pending and reply to be submittedHare Krushna Developers LLP2025-04-17NANon-handover of possession of a property valued at ₹9 crore. Despite payment of ₹8.87 crore to the Builder, Hare Krushna Developers LLP possession of the property has not been granted within the agreed time frame as per the Builder’s Commitment. Multiple reminders and requests have been made, but the builder has failed to provide possession or proper response.