0000002024-10-012024-12-310000002024-12-310000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors10000002024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors10000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors20000002024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors20000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors30000002024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors30000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors40000002024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors40000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors50000002024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors50000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors60000002024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors60000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors70000002024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors70000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors80000002024-12-31CompositionOfBoardOfDirectors80000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees140000002024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees140000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees150000002024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees150000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees160000002024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees160000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees410000002024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees410000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees420000002024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees420000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees430000002024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees430000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees680000002024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees680000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees690000002024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees690000002024-10-012024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees700000002024-12-31CompositionOfCommittees700000002024-12-31MeetingOfBoardOfDirectors10000002024-10-012024-12-31MeetingOfBoardOfDirectors10000002024-12-31MeetingOfBoardOfDirectors20000002024-10-012024-12-31MeetingOfBoardOfDirectors20000002024-12-31MeetingOfBoardOfDirectors30000002024-10-012024-12-31MeetingOfBoardOfDirectors30000002024-10-012024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees10000002024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees10000002024-10-012024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees20000002024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees20000002024-10-012024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees30000002024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees30000002024-10-012024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees40000002024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees40000002024-10-012024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees50000002024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees50000002024-10-012024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees60000002024-12-31MeetingOfCommittees60000002024-09-300000002024-12-31OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain10000002024-12-31OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain20000002024-12-31OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain30000002024-12-31OngoingTaxLitigationsOrDisputesDomain4xbrli:pure000000GTECJAINXNOTLISTEDINE586X01012G-TEC JAINX EDUCATION LIMITED2024-04-012025-03-31Quarterly2024-12-31EquitytruetruefalseDuring the year under review, there is no acquisition of shares or voting rights in unlisted companies. falseDuring the quarter, there is no fine or penality imposed to the company. trueAny othertrueK00614OriginaltruetrueMrSUDHKAR PANDURANG SONAWANE01689700Executive DirectorNot ApplicableMD1973-03-11falseActiveNA1999-04-292023-02-14961010MrRAJVIRENDRA SINGH RAJPUROHIT06770931Non-Executive - Independent DirectorNot Applicable1989-04-05falseActiveNA2017-02-092022-02-09963353MrMANISH HEERALAL CHANDAK08220007Non-Executive - Independent DirectorNot Applicable1989-03-21falseActiveNA2020-09-042020-09-04522212MrsARCHANA SANJAY SAINI08427866Non-Executive - Independent DirectorNot Applicable1978-03-20falseActiveNA2019-05-062024-05-06681120MrsSONIA RAKESH BHATIA07306337Non-Executive - Independent DirectorNot Applicable1981-05-25falseActiveNA2022-12-282022-12-28251101MrMEHROOF MANALODY02713624Executive DirectorNot ApplicableMD1972-05-03falseActiveNA2022-12-122022-12-12251000MrROYCHAND CHENRAJ01356394Non-Executive - Non Independent DirectorChairperson related to Promoter1961-05-07falseActiveNA2022-12-122022-12-12251000MrEASWARAN SUBRAMANIAM IYER10072574Non-Executive - Non Independent DirectorNot Applicable1957-11-01falseActiveNA2023-04-252023-04-25211000truetruetruefalseAudit Committee08220007MANISH HEERALAL CHANDAKNon-Executive - Independent DirectorChairperson2020-09-04Audit Committee06770931RAJVIRENDRA SINGH RAJPUROHITNon-Executive - Independent DirectorMember2017-02-09Audit Committee08427866ARCHANA SANJAY SAININon-Executive - Independent DirectorMember2023-04-25Nomination and remuneration committee06770931RAJVIRENDRA SINGH RAJPUROHITNon-Executive - Independent DirectorChairperson2017-02-09Nomination and remuneration committee08427866ARCHANA SANJAY SAININon-Executive - Independent DirectorMember2019-05-06Nomination and remuneration committee01356394ROYCHAND CHENRAJNon-Executive - Non Independent DirectorMember2022-12-28Stakeholders Relationship Committee07306337SONIA RAKESH BHATIANon-Executive - Independent DirectorChairperson2022-12-25Stakeholders Relationship Committee08427866ARCHANA SANJAY SAININon-Executive - Independent DirectorMember2019-05-06Stakeholders Relationship Committee01689700SUDHKAR PANDURANG SONAWANEExecutive DirectorMember2023-04-252024-07-01true8742024-08-0736true8842024-11-1397true873Audit Committee2024-08-07true3331Audit Committee2024-11-1397true3331Nomination and remuneration committee2024-07-01true3331Nomination and remuneration committee2024-11-13134true3331Stakeholders Relationship Committee2024-08-07true3331Stakeholders Relationship Committee2024-11-1397true3331truetruetruetrueNAtruetruetruePriyanka PandeyCompany Secretary and Compliance OfficerfalsePriyanka PandeyCompany Secretary and Compliance OfficerMumbai2025-01-1600000Manoj Kumar Yadav2015-07-31Plaintiff and Defendant had entered into an Franchise Agreement with “M/S SHREE INFOTECH” dated 01.03.2011 as the Defendant was desirous of conducting specialized computer software and hardware training programmes under the brand name of ‘Keerti Computer Institute’ and provide the training Exclusively at Badlapur (East) for 3 year, for that Defendant agreed to pay 15% as Royalty & service Tax termed as ‘Recurring Franchisee Fees’ on the same and defended could not enter into or carry on same business during and 2 year after the term of the Agreement. The Plaintiff states that it was unequivocally agreed between defendant and plaintiff that each shall be bound by the terms and conditions of the Franchisee Agreement. Further, the Plaintiff states that defendant in contravention of the Agreement not only defaulted in remitting the Recurring Franchisee Fees but also blatantly failed to make payment of the said fees in a timely manner. However, pursuant to continuing default to pay outstanding Recurring Franchisee fees, the Plaintiff was constrained to send Two demand notices demanding an amount of Rs.2,14,145/- from defendant on 31st July, 2015 & 17th Nov. 2015. Defendant has given reply vide notice dated 22nd august 2015 and denied to accept the liability for 2,14,145/-. And Defendant has started operating from the same premises and providing services as that of plaintiff under the name and brand of viddya Computer Institute. Therefore, now plaintiff has initiated legal action against the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 2,37,701/- towards the amount due and payable by you toward the unpaid recurring franchisee fees. Plaintiff has prayed to the Hon’ble Court for interest @12% p.a on the said sum of Rs. 2,14,145/- till payment. an Franchise Agreement with“ M/S SHREE HARI INFOTECH” dated 14. 08.2011 as the Defendant was desirous of conducting specialized computer software and hardware training programmes under the brand name of ‘Keerti Computer Institute’ and provide the training Exclusively at Badlapur (West) for 3 year, for that Defendant agreed to pay 15% as Royalty & service Tax termed as ‘Recurring Franchisee Fees’ on the same and defended could not enter into or carry on same business during and 2 year after the term of the Agreement. The Plaintiff states that it was unequivocally agreed between defendant and plaintiff that each shall be bound by the terms and conditions of the Franchisee Agreement Further, the Plaintiff states that defendant in contravention of the Agreement not only defaulted in remitting the Recurring Franchisee Fees but also blatantly failed to make payment of the said fees in a timely manner. However, pursuant to continuing default to pay outstanding Recurring Franchisee fees the Plaintiff was constrained to send Two demand notices demanding an amount of Rs. 2,55,605/- from defendant on 31st July, 2015 & 17th Nov. 2015. Defendant has given reply on notice dated 22nd august 2015 and denied to accept the liability for 2,55,605/-And Defendant has started operating from the same premises and providing services as that of plaintiff under the name and brand of Viddya Computer Institute. Therefore, now plaintiff initiated legal action against the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 283722 /- towards the amount due and payable toward the unpaid recurring franchisee fees. Plaintiff has prayed to the Hon’ble Court for interest @12% p.a on the said sum of Rs. 255605/- till payment.SUMMENS FOR JUDGEMENT HEARINGManoj Yadav2015-07-31To pay defaulted outstanding dues/ royaltySUMMENS FOR JUDGEMENT HEARINGAshish Arun Sutar2015-10-05Plaintiff had entered into a Franchise Agreement with “M/s Samarth Infotech” Dated 01.12.2013 as the Defendant was desirous of conducting specialized computer software and hardware training programmes under the brand name of ‘Keerti Computer Institute’) at Kalyan (West) for 3 year, for which Defendant agreed to pay 15% as Royalty & service Tax termed as ‘Recurring Franchisee Fees’ on the same and defended could not enter into or carry on same business during and 2 year after the term of the Agreement. The Plaintiff states that it was unequivocally agreed between defendant and plaintiff that each shall be bound by the terms and conditions of the Franchisee Agreement Further, the Plaintiff states that defendant in contravention of the Agreement not only defaulted in remitting the Recurring Franchisee Fees 202 Plaintiff Defendants Facts of the case Claim Amount Court Status but also blatantly failed to make payment of the said fees in a timely manner. However, pursuant to continuing default to pay outstanding Recurring Franchisee fees , the Plaintiff was constrained to send Two demand notices demanding an amount of Rs. 78,695/- from defendant on 5th October, 2015 and 23rd November, 2015. Defendant has given reply vide notice dated 23rd November,2015 and denied to accept the liability for Rs. 78,695. And Defendant has started operating from the same premises and providing services as that of plaintiff under the name and brand of Viddya Computer Institute. Therefore, now plaintiff has initiated legal action against the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 87,351/- towards the amount due and payable. Plaintiff has prayed to the Hon’ble Court for interest @12% p.a on the said sum of Rs. 78,695/- till payment.SUMMENS FOR JUDGEMENT HEARINGAshish Arun Sutar2015-10-05Plaintiff had entered into a Franchise Agreement with “M/s Samarth Enterprises” dated 01.09.2011 as the Defendant was desirous of conducting specialized computer software and hardware training programmes under the brand name of ‘Keerti Computer Institute’ at Vikhroli (West) for 3 year, for which Defendant has to pay 15% as Royalty & service Tax termed as ‘Recurring Franchisee Fees’ on the same and defended could not enter into or carry on same business during and 2 year after the term of the Agreement. The Plaintiff states that it was unequivocally agreed between defendant and plaintiff that each shall be bound by the terms and conditions of the Franchisee Agreement Further, the Plaintiff states that defendant in contravention of the Agreement not only defaulted in remitting the Recurring Franchisee Fees but also blatantly failed to make payment of the said fees in a timely manner. However, pursuant to continuing default to pay outstanding 203 Plaintiff Defendants Facts of the case Claim Amount Court Status Recurring Franchisee fees to Plaintiff, the Plaintiff was constrained to send Two demand notices demanding an amount of Rs. 2,47,695/- from defendant on 5th October, 2015 and 17th November, 2015 respectively. Defendant has given reply vide notice dated 17th November, 2015 and denied to accept the liability for 2,47,695. And Defendant has started operating from the same premises and providing services as that of plaintiff under the name and brand of Viddya Computer Institute. Therefore, now plaintiff has initiated legal action against the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 2,74,941/- towards the amount due and payable. Plaintiff has prayed to the Hon’ble court for interest @12% p.a on the said sum of Rs. 2,47,695/- till payment.CHAMBER SUMMONS FOR REPLY