CORDSCABLE2026-10-28CORDSCABLE2026-10-28ActionsTakenOrOrdersPassedDomain1CORDSCABLE2026-10-28ActionsTakenOrOrdersPassedDomain1PersonsAgainstWhomActionsTakenOrOrdersPassedDomain1CORDSCABLE2026-10-28SignatoriesDomain1xbrli:pureCORDSCABLECORDS CABLE INDUSTRIES LIMITED532941NOTLISTEDINE792I01017NewAction(s) taken or orders passed (sub-para 20)false2026-10-2412:55:002026-10-28Any other similar action(s)The Commissioner (Appeals), after considering the facts, submissions and documentary evidence placed on record, passed an order in favour of the Company, allowing its appeal and setting aside, to the extent challenged in the appeal, the impugned Order-in-Original _No. 69/GST/BHD-TIJARA/24-25 dated 28 February 2025, whereby the Assistant Commissioner had confirmed demands of Rs. 45,91,987/- and Rs. 4,823/- along with penalties of Rs. 4,59,198/-, Rs 5,33,822/- and Rs. 10,000/- and applicable interest.Regulatory AuthorityOffice of the Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur, Rajasthan.1Listed Entity (Self)CORDS CABLE INDUSTRIES LIMITEDOrder-in-Appeal dated October 16, 2026, bearing Order-in-Appeal No. 1051(DAK)CGST/IPR/2026, passed by the Office of the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Goods and Services Tax, Jaipur, under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 against the Order-in-Original dated February 28, 2025, passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division, Tijara, Bhiwadi, Rajasthan, concerning input tax credit (ITC) for the financial year 2020-21.The Commissioner (Appeals), after considering the facts, submissions and documentary evidence placed on record, passed an order in favour of the Company, allowing its appeal and setting aside, to the extent challenged in the appeal, the impugned Order-in-Original _No. 69/GST/BHD-TIJARA/24-25 dated 28 February 2025, whereby the Assistant Commissioner had confirmed demands of Rs. 45,91,987/- and Rs. 4,823/- along with penalties of Rs. 4,59,198/-, Rs 5,33,822/- and Rs. 10,000/- and applicable interest. The Company shall also file an application with the concerned department for a refund of the pre-deposit amount.2026-10-24The Commissioner (Appeals), after considering the facts, submissions and documentary evidence placed on record, passed an order in favour of the Company, allowing its appeal and setting aside, to the extent challenged in the appeal, the impugned Order-in-Original _No. 69/GST/BHD-TIJARA/24-25 dated 28 February 2025, whereby the Assistant Commissioner had confirmed demands of Rs. 45,91,987/- and Rs. 4,823/- along with penalties of Rs. 4,59,198/-, Rs 5,33,822/- and Rs. 10,000/- and applicable interest. The Company shall also file an application with the concerned department for a refund of the pre-deposit amount.financial year 2020-21There is no material impact on financial, operations or other activities of the company.Not ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableThe Company shall also file an application with the concerned department for a refund of the pre-deposit amount.Naveen SawhneyManaging Director2026-10-28New Delhi