| Annexure II to be submitted by listed entity at the end of the financial year (for the whole of financial year) |
| I. Disclosure on website in terms of LODR Regulation |
| Sr |
Item
| Compliance status (Yes/No/NA)
| If status is No details of non-compliance may be given here.
| Web address
|
| 1.1 |
Details of business |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/overview/ |
| 1.2 |
Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/other-compliance/ |
| 1.3 |
Brief profile of board of directors including directorship and full time positions in body corporates |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/management/board-of-directors/ |
| 2 |
Terms and conditions of appointment of independent directors |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Terms-and-conditions-of-Appointment-of-Independent-Directors.pdf |
| 3 |
Composition of various committees of board of directors |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/composition-of-board-committees/ |
| 4 |
Code of conduct of board of directors and senior management personnel |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Code-of-Conduct-of-Directors-and-Senior-Management-Personnel.pdf |
| 5 |
Details of establishment of vigil mechanism or whistle blower policy |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Vigil-Mechanism-Whistle-Blower-Policy.pdf |
| 6 |
Criteria of making payments to non-executive directors |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Nomination-and-Remuneration-Policy-1.pdf |
| 7 |
Policy on dealing with related party transactions |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/wp content/uploads/2021/08/Policy-on-related-party-transactions.pdf |
| 8 |
Policy for determining material subsidiaries |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Policy-for-determining-Material-Subsidiary-1.pdf |
| 9 |
Details of familiarization programmes imparted to independent directors |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Familiarisation-program-for-Independent-Directors.pdf |
| 10 |
Contact information of the designated officials of the listed entity who are responsible for assisting and handling investor grievances |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/contact-investor-grievances/ |
| 11 |
Email address for grievance redressal and other relevant details |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/contact-investor-grievances/ |
| 12 |
Financial results |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/g-r-infraprojects-limited/ |
| 13 |
Shareholding pattern |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/shareholding-pattern/ |
| 14 |
Details of agreements entered into with the media companies and/or their associates |
NA |
|
|
| 15.1 |
Schedule of analyst or institutional investor meet and presentation prepared by listed entity for analyst or institutional investor meet |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/earning-calls/ |
| 15.2 |
Audio or video recordings and transcripts of post earnings/quarterly calls |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/earning-calls/ |
| 16 |
New name and the old name of the listed entity |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/history/ |
| 17 |
Advertisements as per regulation 47 (1) |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/news-paper-advertisement/ |
| 18 |
Credit rating or revision in credit rating obtained |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/credit-rating/ |
| 19 |
Separate audited financial statements of each subsidiary of the listed entity |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/subsidiaries/ |
| 20 |
Secretarial compliance report |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/secretarial-compliance-report/ |
| 21 |
Materiality policy as per regulation 30 (4) |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Policy-for-determining-Material-Events-and-Information.pdf |
| 22 |
Disclosure of contact details of KMP who are authorized for the purpose of determining materiality as required under regulation 30(5) |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Details-of-KMP-determining-Material-Event-Information.pdf |
| 23 |
Disclosures under regulation 30(8) |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/intimations-under-regulation-30/ |
| 24 |
Statements of deviation(s) or variations(s) as specified in regulation 32 |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/material-deviation-letters/ |
| 25 |
Dividend distribution policy as specified in regulation 43A (1) |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Dividend-Distribution-policy.pdf |
| 26.1 |
Annual return as provided under section 92 of the Companies Act 2013 |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/annual-return/ |
| 26.2 |
Employee benefit scheme documents framed in terms of SEBI (SBEB) regulations 2021 |
|
|
|
| 27 |
Confirmation that the above disclosures are in a separate section as specified in regulation 46(2) |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/subsidiaries/ |
| 28 |
Compliance with regulation 46(3) with respect to accuracy of disclosures on the website and timely updation |
Yes |
|
https://www.grinfra.com/annual-report-and-results/ |
| 29 |
Disclosure of notes on website in terms of Listing Regulations explanatory |
|
Disclosure of Imposition of Fine or Penalty
The details of imposition of fine or penalty during the quarter in terms of sub-para 20 of para A of Part A of Schedule III are given below: |
| Any Other Information for Disclosure of Imposition of Fine or Penalty |
|
| Sr. No. |
Name of the authority |
Nature and details of the action(s) taken or order(s) passed |
Date of receipt of direction or order, including any ad interim or interim orders, or any other communication from the authority |
Details of the violation(s)/ contravention(s) committed or alleged to be committed |
Impact on financial, operation or other activities of the listed entity, quantifiable in monetary terms to the extent possible |
| 1
| District Collector, Dholpur, Rajasthan |
Imposition of Penalty of Rs. 95,592/-
| 17-Mar-2026 |
Alleged use of land contrary to permitted land use. |
Except for the financial impact to the extent of the applicable penalty amount, there is no other impact on the operational or other business activities of the Company |
| 2
| Office of Mining Officer, Boudh, Odisha |
Deposition of balance DMF & EMF against Penalty, Royalty and other Charges in five cases total amounting to Rs. 5,31,132/-
| 25-Feb-2026 |
Storing of Material without prior permission of the Mining Department. |
Except for the financial impact to the extent of the applicable penalty amount, there is no other impact on the operational or other business activities of the Company. |
| 3
| Goods and Service Tax Department, Jodhpur |
Imposition of Penalty of Rs. 7431/-
| 02-Mar-2026 |
As per the observations of the GST Department, the Company was alleged to have availed ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) during the audit period FY 2022–23 and 2023–24. The Company has disputed the said observations and does not agree with the contention of the department. However, in order to avoid prolonged litigation the Company has voluntarily deposited the applicable penalty amount without admission of liability. |
Except for the financial impact to the extent of the applicable penalty amount, there is no other impact on the operational or other business activities of the Company |
| 4
| Deputy Commissioner, Eluru-II, Andhra Pradesh |
Imposition of Penalty of Rs. 40,200/-
| 24-Feb-2026 |
Alleged Non-Generation of E-Way bill |
Except for the financial impact to the extent of the applicable penalty amount, there is no other impact on the operational or other business activities of the Company |
Disclosure of Updates to Ongoing Tax Litigations or Disputes
The updates on tax litigations or disputes in terms of sub-para 8 of para B of Part A of Schedule III read with corresponding provisions
of Annexure 18 of the Master Circular are given below: |
| Any Other Information for Disclosure of Updates to Ongoing Tax Litigations or Disputes |
|
| Sr. No. |
Name of the opposing party |
Date of initiation of the litigation / dispute |
Status of the litigation / dispute as per last disclosure |
Current status of the litigation / dispute |
| 1
| Joint Commissioner, Circle-B, Udaipur, AC /CTO Ward:Circle-B, Udaipur, Rajasthan |
09-Jan-2025
| Reengus Sikar Expressway Limited a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court against GST demand order of Rs. 25.90 Crores for the period FY 2017-18 to 2022-23. The Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court vide its order dated 17.03.2025 has stayed recovery of demand raised by the GST Department. |
Reengus Sikar Expressway Limited a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court against GST demand order of Rs. 25.90 Crores for the period FY 2017-18 to 2022-23.The Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court vide its order dated 17.03.2025 has stayed recovery of demand raised by the GST Department. |
| 2
| Joint Commissioner, Circle-C, Enforcement Wing-III, Jaipur, Rajasthan. |
07-Jul-2023
| Nagaur Mukundgarh Highways Private Limited a Subsidiary of the Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court against GST demand order for the period FY 2017-18 to 2022-23. The writ is pending before High Court. |
Nagaur Mukundgarh Highways Private Limited a Subsidiary of the Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court against GST demand order for the period FY 2017-18 to 2022-23. The writ is pending before High Court. |
| 3
| Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs |
12-Feb-2019
| Nagaur Mukundgarh Highways Private Limited a Subsidiary of the Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court against the order passed by the Rajasthan Appeallate Authority for Advance Ruling Goods and Service Tax. The writ is pending before High Court. |
Nagaur Mukundgarh Highways Private Limited a Subsidiary of the Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court against the order passed by the Rajasthan Appeallate Authority for Advance Ruling Goods and Service Tax. The writ is pending before High Court. |
| 4
| Joint Commissioner, Circle-C, Enforcement Wing-III, Jaipur, Rajasthan. |
08-Mar-2023
| Nagaur Mukundgarh Highways Private Limited a Subsidiary of the Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court against the Corrigendum u/s 161 of RGST/CGST Act for the FY 2022-23 for increase in GST demand from Rs. 4.52 Crores to Rs. 6.78 Crores. The writ is pending before High Court. |
Nagaur Mukundgarh Highways Private Limited a Subsidiary of the Company has filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court against the Corrigendum u/s 161 of RGST/CGST Act for the FY 2022-23 for increase in GST demand from Rs. 4.52 Crores to Rs. 6.78 Crores. The writ is pending before High Court. |
| 5
| Order No. UDZ-EXCUS-000-COM-0007-0008-19-20 (SCN No. Comm. CGST&CX(Audit), Jodhpur & SCN No. AC, CGST, Udaipur) |
26-Sep-2019
| The Company has filed appeal with CESTAT against demand order of Rs. 7.42 Crores raised by Service Tax Department for the period from March 2016 to April 2017. The appeal has been filed at CESTAT. |
The Company has filed appeal with CESTAT against demand order of Rs. 7.42 Crores raised by Service Tax Department for the period from March 2016 to April 2017. The appeal has been filed at CESTAT. |
| 6
| Assistant Commissioner, Service Tax, Udaipur |
29-Nov-2016
| The Company has filed appeal with CESTAT against rejection of refund of Rs. 3.60 Crores by Service Tax Department for the period from March 2015 to January 2016. The appeal has been filed at CESTAT. |
The entire demand is dropped vide order dated 14.01.2026 & the tax already paid for Rs. 3.60 Cr is now refundable. |
| 7
| CPC, Bengaluru |
10-Oct-2022
| Reengus Sikar Expressway Limited a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Company has filed an appeal with CIT(Appeal) against erroneous order passed by CPC-Bengaluru for AY 21-22 for granting short credit of TDS. The matter is pending to be heard by CIT(A) however the demand has already been adjusted against the refund of subsequent years. |
Reengus Sikar Expressway Limited a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Company has filed an appeal with CIT(Appeal) against erroneous order passed by CPC-Bengaluru for AY 21-22 for granting short credit of TDS. The matter is pending to be heard by CIT(A) however the demand has already been adjusted against the refund of subsequent years. |
| 8
| Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Centralised Processing Cell TDS, Aaykar Bhawan Sector 3 Vaishali, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201010 |
09-Jun-2024
| The Company has filed writ petition with Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court against demand of Rs. 48.32 Lakh raised by the Income Tax Department for FY 2023-24. The Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court has passed an order dated 17-03-2025 to quash the Intimation-cum-Demand Notice issued & and remanded back the matter to the respondent-authority to provide an opportunity of hearing to the Company and to pass fresh orders strictly in accordance with law. The Deputy Commissioner of Income tax, Circle-TDS, Udaipur has rejected the Assessee Contention against the demand vide order u/s 154 of the Act. The Company has filed a writ petition against the said order before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court. |
The Company has filed writ petition with Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court against demand of Rs. 48.32 Lakh raised by the Income Tax Department for FY 2023-24. The Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court has passed an order dated 17-03-2025 to quash the Intimation-cum-Demand Notice issued & and remanded back the matter to the respondent-authority to provide an opportunity of hearing to the Company and to pass fresh orders strictly in accordance with law. The Deputy Commissioner of Income tax, Circle-TDS, Udaipur has rejected the Assessee Contention against the demand vide order u/s 154 of the Act. The Company has filed a writ petition against the said order before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court.The Deputy Commissioner of Income tax, Circle-TDS, Udaipur has rejected the Assessee Contention against the demand vide order u/s 154 of the Act. The Company has filed a writ petition against the said order before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court. At first hearing, the Court has given time and opportunity to the Department for making submission in support of their argument. |
| 9
| Assistant Commissioner CGST, Audit Circle Imphal, Manipur |
30-Nov-2023
| The Company has filed appeal before GST Appellate Authority against demand order of Rs. 54 Lakhs for the FY 2018-19. The appeal has been filed to GST Appellate Authority. |
The Company has filed appeal before GST Appellate Authority against demand order of Rs. 54 Lakhs for the FY 2018-19. The appeal has been filed to GST Appellate Authority. |
| 10
| Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Jaipur, Rajasthan |
04-Jun-2024
| The Company has filed appeal before GST Appellate Authority against demand of Rs. 43.92 Lakhs raised by GST Department for the FY 2018-19. The appeal has been filed to GST Appellate Authority. |
The Company has filed appeal before GST Appellate Authority against demand of Rs. 43.92 Lakhs raised by GST Department for the FY 2018-19. The appeal has been filed to GST Appellate Authority. |
| 11
| Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Ratlam Division, Ratlam, Madhya Pradesh |
07-Mar-2022
| The Company has filed appeal before GST Appellate Authority against refund rejection order of Rs. 78.62 Lakhs for the month of December 2019. The appeal has been filed to GST Appellate Authority. |
The Company has filed appeal before GST Appellate Authority against refund rejection order of Rs. 78.62 Lakhs for the month of December 2019. The appeal has been filed to GST Appellate Authority. |
| 12
| Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Ratlam Division, Ratlam, Madhya Pradesh |
04-Apr-2022
| The Company has filed appeal before GST Appellate Authority against refund rejection order of Rs. 1.16 Crores for the month of January 2020. The appeal has been filed to GST Appellate Authority |
The Company has filed appeal before GST Appellate Authority against refund rejection order of Rs. 1.16 Crores for the month of January 2020. The appeal has been filed to GST Appellate Authority |
| 13
| State of Himachal Pradesh and Others |
25-Jun-2024
| The Company has received Rs. 82.47 Lakhs from Department of State Taxes and Excise, Himachal Pradesh, as against claimed amount of Rs. 420.18 Lakhs. |
The Company has received Rs. 82.47 Lakhs from Department of State Taxes and Excise, Himachal Pradesh, as against claimed amount of Rs. 420.18 Lakhs. |
| 14
| Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Special Circle, Patna, Bihar |
14-Aug-2025
| The Company has received a demand order under the GST Act for the financial years 2021-22 and 2022-23, relating to GST liability on royalty on Balu (Sand) under both the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) and Forward Charge, covering tax, interest, and penalty.The appeal to First Appellate Authority, Additional Commissioner of State Tax, Patna, Speical Circle, Center Division has been filed on 12th November 2025. |
The Company has received a demand order under the GST Act for the financial years 2021-22 and 2022-23, relating to GST liability on royalty on Balu (Sand) under both the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) and Forward Charge, covering tax, interest, and penalty.The appeal to First Appellate Authority, Additional Commissioner of State Tax, Patna, Speical Circle, Center Division has been filed on 12th November 2025. |
| 15
| State Tax Officer, Ghatak-11, Range-3, Division-1, Ahmedabad, Gujarat |
13-Mar-2026
| A demand of ₹1,70,566, comprising tax, interest, and penalty, has been raised on account of ITC reversal for FY 2018–19 due to retrospective cancellation of the supplier’s registration. The Company has filed an appeal against the said order before the First Appellate Authority. |
A demand of ₹1,70,566, comprising tax, interest, and penalty, has been raised on account of ITC reversal for FY 2018–19 due to retrospective cancellation of the supplier’s registration. The Company has filed an appeal against the said order before the First Appellate Authority. |
| 16
| Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Patna Special Circle, Patna, Bihar |
27-Mar-2026
| A demand of Rs. 17,59,322/- comprising tax, interest, and penalty, has been raised on account of ITC reversal for FY 2018–19 due to non-submission of return by supplier. The Company has filed an appeal against the said order before the First Appellate Authority. |
A demand of Rs. 17,59,322/- comprising tax, interest, and penalty, has been raised on account of ITC reversal for FY 2018–19 due to non-submission of return by supplier. The Company has filed an appeal against the said order before the First Appellate Authority. |